- It's mostly a "small" tax increase bill. The net tax increase is being reported at about $600 billion over 10 years. That averages $60 billion a year against deficits that look like they are going to be in the $1 trillion plus range for the foreseeable future off of this baseline. So we should prepare for our fifth straight year of deficit spending greater than a trillion dollars and 7% of GDP.
- It gives away some of the benefit of "tax reform" before we've even gotten to tax reform. It's hard to find exact estimates but the PEP and Pease changes probably raise about $100 billion or so in the 10 year window. That's $100 billion of the $800 billion or so that has been discussed in "tax reform" discussions.
- It makes a future "grand bargain" much, much harder. The notion of a "grand bargain," that is tax increases for spending cuts was always a decent idea in the context of Washington but it would appear that idea is all but dead. There's just not much one can do on tax increases now without increasing taxes on the middle class and thus the math of a grand bargain is simply not going to work.
- It smells like a spending increase relative to the baseline. The only report I've seen says "net" spending reductions are $15 billion. But Congress includes reduction in debt service as a spending reduction and likely is using current policy as the baseline. Thus, the debt service change (probably $60 to $90 billion of the $600 total) is probably counted as a spending cut meaning that spending, ex-debt service, most likely increased.
So is there anything good about the bill? I can only come up with two things. First, the reported permanent indexing of the AMT to inflation is a really good thing. Assuming that stays in, it's a positive change from our perpetual patching process. Second, the continuation of UI benefits is, from my perspective, also a good thing. We can debate the merits of the UI system but putting some money in the pockets of people who have been employed is a good thing until we figure out a better unemployment system. Sure it costs $30 billion but we could easily make that up somewhere else if we really wanted to.
And that's pretty much all she wrote. Can kicking continues and looks like it's going to continue on pace for the foreseeable future. There will be a lot of griping on both sides but in my view, Washington is simply incapable of dealing with the debt problem we have. This latest event simply sheds more light on their (and our) dysfunction.